Why Remote Viewing Isn't Really "Remote Viewing"

How And Why Government Bureaucracy Created a Psychic Misnomer

energy

Bookmark and Share


Many years ago, in the 1970's, when psychics like Ingo Swann were creating the remote viewing protocols at Standford Research Institute, they had to think of a name for their protocols. Ingo thought a name like "remote viewing" would sound neat and cool enough to get the U.S. government intelligence agencies to fund them. So the name itself came from a desire to create more funding for the viewing research project which was headed by Russell Targ and Hal Putoff. It wasn't necessarily the best name for the process itself.

Years later, many wonder whether "remote viewing"--which is the ability to describe distant places, locations, and events without conventional means--is the best name for it. If people or objects have some type of instantaneous communications between them, are they really "remote"? And doesn't talking about the phenomena this way keep us stuck in the Cartesian-Newtonian paradigm when we know deep down inside that we should be moving on to something better like a quantum-based explanation.

The quantum perspective offers an alternate way of looking at resonance and viewing, as from a quantum point of view our reality is really "nothingness" made of energy waves that sometimes masquerade as particles. The universe is, in fact, made up of mostly empty space. But the emptiness is full of energy which has patterns.

If you think about it, things in a quantum universe are not really remote at all. There is no remoteness at a quantum level, because as Bell's Inequality shows, particles can interact at a distance with no time lag. They can interact faster than the speed of light and, in a sense, are still one particle, no matter what their distance.

So if things are not really distant from one another, you might wonder what separates them. The answer is: frequency. Separate objects, people, and places each have a unique frequency which creates a unique place for them in space and time.

This separate frequency give each place, person, thing a location in the matrix of energy and information that is the basis for our universe.

Therefore, in this sense, they don't have remoteness as a quality but resonance instead. Objects, people, and places each have their own unique frequency and vibration. (That's of course how radio stations can exist right next to each other on the dial.)

It might make more sense to refer to it as resonant viewing, virtual identification, or just call it "viewing" instead. If you have experienced viewing at all, which I hope you have by now with my free viewing class, then you know that it doesn't feel distant at all. The target contact gives a sense of immediacy and presence.

Whatever you can want to call it, just remember that remote viewing isn't really remote after all!

Virtual Viewing Information

Free Viewing Mini Class

What Sorts of People Are Good At Remote Viewing?

Remote Viewing and Creativity

Contact Us

Privacy Policy