UFO Over Wales
A common use of remote and resonant viewing methods is to view more challenging targets like UFOs, ETs, deceased spirits, weird animals and monsters, and other types of hard to perceive, subtle things that often difficult to study. In my view, this is definitely a valid use for viewing. No doubt about it.
In fact, it's a very good use of viewing because you are going to hard pressed to contact these types of things in any other way. Not that it can't be done with conventional means. It's just that these targets often exist outside the realm of our conventional senses. Or they are rare. So there isn't a reliable way to have contact with them, if that is what you are looking for.
Viewing, because it exists outside the realm of the conscious mind, can seen as akin to having something like "x-ray" vision. You can sense and perceive things beyond the realm of your conventional senses. So you can describe things that you can't physically see. That includes a wide range of "esoteric topics," that for lack of a better description, are described as paranormal.
However, because you can't always double-check your results, like you can with a physical target that you can take a photo of, you are never sure of the results. I've been present at many sessions with talented viewers who were viewing the inside of allegedly alien spacecraft. They seemed to have great target contact with the UFO and it's contents.
It's an amazing process to experience, if the viewer is having a good time doing it. You also have to keep in mind that because we can't actually visit the craft after the session is over, we have no knowing how accurate their session is. They might be on target, or not. So this type of session is often totally or partially unverifiable.
In the picture below, the viewer was describing the inside of the object seen over Mexico City in 1997. Once inside she saw this chair-like object which she drew.
 UFO Seen Over Mexico City, 1997 |
 Chair-like Object Seen Inside UFO |
At the end of the day, we usually can't tell about the viewer's hits or misses during the session because we don't have any target feedback beyond the original photo, if that is what we were using. We'd have to go inside the UFO or whatever was being viewed a the time, to do that.
But it's safe to say that viewer will learn from sessions like these. It stretches their boundaries and pushes them to the limit of their sensory and descriptive capacities. And that's important: part of being a good viewer is having the vocabulary and capacity to verbally describe what they are experiencing and sensing. This takes practice. And esoteric, non-verifiable targets enhance this aspect of viewing.
So, if the viewer learns a lot about themselves from doing a viewing session, on any type of target, it's always a good session. And that's what counts the most. At the end of the day, it's not just accuracy that matters: it's learning to see and interact with a bigger universe. And you need practice for that which viewing supplies in spades.
If you are interested, here's a link to some of the stranger targets we've viewed over the years:
Weird and Interesting Viewing Targets Including UFOs, ETs, and Crop Circles.
Virtual Viewing Information
Free Viewing "Mini Class"
Why Remote Viewing Is Not "Remote Viewing"
Learning To Avoid The Void
Remote Viewing and Creativity
Contact Us
Privacy Policy |
